<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Not As Mom &amp; Pop Friendly as IE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknews.net/2007/05/31/firefox-not-as-mom-pop-friendly-as-ie/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknews.net/2007/05/31/firefox-not-as-mom-pop-friendly-as-ie</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Superheroes, Retro Tech, RPGs, Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ikram</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknews.net/2007/05/31/firefox-not-as-mom-pop-friendly-as-ie/comment-page-1#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ikram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknews.net/?p=955#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>I am just wondering why Microsoft has implemented its parental controls specifically the website blocking only in IE. As the name says &quot;Windows Vista Parental Controls&quot; , so it should apply to the whole Windows and not just IE. Or it should be removed from Windows Vista Parental Controls and put into something like IE Parental Control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just wondering why Microsoft has implemented its parental controls specifically the website blocking only in IE. As the name says &#8220;Windows Vista Parental Controls&#8221; , so it should apply to the whole Windows and not just IE. Or it should be removed from Windows Vista Parental Controls and put into something like IE Parental Control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknews.net/2007/05/31/firefox-not-as-mom-pop-friendly-as-ie/comment-page-1#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknews.net/?p=955#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>Oh my bad, did the impression of the article say that users should switch? I didn&#039;t say or imply that, the purpose is to ensure parents are aware of it and mitigate it somehow. How a parent chooses to mitigate it is up to them.

My personal recommendation is to continue to use what you&#039;re most familiar with and that you trust, if there are limitations or bugs and you&#039;re willing to accept them, then more power to you. It applies to the OS, the office suite, the browser, the mobile phone, the gaming console, blah blah blah. :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my bad, did the impression of the article say that users should switch? I didn&#8217;t say or imply that, the purpose is to ensure parents are aware of it and mitigate it somehow. How a parent chooses to mitigate it is up to them.</p>
<p>My personal recommendation is to continue to use what you&#8217;re most familiar with and that you trust, if there are limitations or bugs and you&#8217;re willing to accept them, then more power to you. It applies to the OS, the office suite, the browser, the mobile phone, the gaming console, blah blah blah. <img src='http://www.geeknews.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthijs</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknews.net/2007/05/31/firefox-not-as-mom-pop-friendly-as-ie/comment-page-1#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknews.net/?p=955#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Ok so now users should use a security hellhole and standards ignoring IE 7 instead of FF because it has no parental control? haha good one!

I would be more worried if they are surfing with IE with parental control on than FF with parental control off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so now users should use a security hellhole and standards ignoring IE 7 instead of FF because it has no parental control? haha good one!</p>
<p>I would be more worried if they are surfing with IE with parental control on than FF with parental control off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
